Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Logics for Defeasible Argumentation
4 General features of argument-based semantics 15 4.1 The `unique status assignment' approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.1.1 Fixed-point de nitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 4.1.2 Recursive de nitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 4.2 The `multiple status assignment' approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 4.3 Comparing the two approaches . . . . . . . . . . ...
متن کاملDefeasible Argumentation Support for an Extended BDI Architecture
In this work, an agent architecture that combines defeasible argumentation and the BDI model is described. Argumentation will be used as a mechanism for reasoning about beliefs, for filtering desires considering the agent’s current environment, and for selecting proper intentions. The approach allows to define different types of agents and this will affect the way in which desires are filtered ...
متن کاملPrioritized Norms in Formal Argumentation
To resolve conflicts among norms, various nonmonotonic formalisms can be used to perform prioritized normative reasoning. Meanwhile, formal argumentation provides a way to represent nonmonotonic logics. In this paper, we propose a representation of prioritized normative reasoning by argumentation. Using hierarchical abstract normative systems, we define three kinds of prioritized normative reas...
متن کاملDialectical Explanations in Defeasible Argumentation
This work addresses the problem of providing explanation capabilities to an argumentation system. Explanation in defeasible argumentation is an important, and yet undeveloped field in the area. Therefore, we move in this direction by defining a concrete argument system with explanation facilities. We consider the structures that provide information on the warrant status of a literal. Our focus ...
متن کاملArgumentation Schemes and Defeasible Inferences
Argumentation schemes are argument forms that represent inferential structures of arguments used in everyday discourse, and in special contexts like legal argumentation, scientific argumentation, and especially in AI. Deductive forms of inference like modus ponens and disjunctive syllogism are very familiar. But some of the most common and interesting argumentation schemes are neither deductive...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
سال: 2012
ISSN: 1012-2443,1573-7470
DOI: 10.1007/s10472-012-9317-7